top of page

The Deloitte Dilemma: Why the Clearinghouse's AI Flaws Demand a New Governance Standard for NIL

The same company at the center of a high-profile AI "hallucination" scandal is gatekeeping millions in athlete earnings. The market cannot afford to look the other way.


NIL Needs a Neutral Referee.

In October 2025, a scandal erupted that should have sent shockwaves through the entire Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) ecosystem. Deloitte, one of the world's most prominent "trusted" advisors, admitted to providing the Australian government with a report containing significant errors and outright fabrications —"hallucinations" generated by its own AI systems.


This was not a minor glitch. It was a fundamental failure in the chain of trust that Deloitte was hired to uphold.


Yet, at this very moment, the same firm holds a position of immense power over the economic future of thousands of college athletes. As part of the House v. NCAA settlement, Deloitte was hired to develop and operate NIL Go, the centralized clearinghouse through which all third-party deals over $600 must be approved.


The parallels are not just concerning; they are a glaring red flag.


The Black Box of "Reasonable Compensation"


The NIL Go platform uses algorithms to perform two critical functions: determining if a deal has a "valid business purpose" and assessing if the compensation falls within a "reasonable range." This process is already opaque, but Deloitte's recent admission raises two alarming questions:


  1. If their AI can "hallucinate" data for a government, could it misapply subjective standards for an athlete's brand value?

  2. Could the "reasonable range" algorithm contain undiscovered biases that systematically undervalue athletes in women's sports, non-revenue men's sports, or from certain demographic backgrounds?


We don't have to speculate. Deloitte has already provided a preview. In September 2025, the firm admitted to misstating the total value of cleared NIL deals, a fundamental data integrity error that casts doubt on the entire system's reporting. If they can't accurately count the money, how can we trust their algorithms to justly evaluate it?


From Reactive Concern to Proactive Governance


The problem is not the use of technology itself; it is the lack of transparent, accountable governance around it. The NIL market was created to rectify an economic injustice, but it risks installing a new, digital form of gatekeeping that is just as opaque and unaccountable as the old NCAA rules.

This is not a problem that can be solved with hopeful optimism. It requires a new architectural standard.


Installing a Check on the System: The Legal Architecture for a Governed NIL Market


At Tiangay Kemokai Law, we foresaw this exact crisis. Our GenAI Governance & Navigation Suite is built to provide the oversight and advocacy the current system lacks. We don't just help clients navigate the bureaucracy; we provide the tools to ensure the system itself operates justly.


Our approach is threefold:

  1. Map the Problem: We use our AI KARENx™ Neutralization Protocol to audit for the kinds of algorithmic bias and "hallucinations" that have already plagued Deloitte's systems elsewhere. We diagnose where the black box is failing athletes.

  2. Secure the Foundation: We apply the COPERNICUS Canon™ to verify data integrity, ensuring that an athlete's compliance record and deal valuations are built on a foundation of authenticated, tamper-proof data.

  3. Govern the System: For institutions, we install The O'Bannon Precedent™, a permanent legal architecture for objective algorithms and transparent approvals. For athletes and collectives, our Athlete Navigator™ and Collective Catalyst™ services provide the expert navigation and leverage to break through bureaucratic gridlock and demand accountability.


The Deloitte dilemma is a wake-up call. It proves that trust in a brand name is not enough. The NIL economy needs independent, rigorous governance to ensure it delivers on its promise of fairness.

The market has a choice: repeat the mistakes of the past or build a better, more accountable future.


Ready to ensure your NIL operations are built on a foundation of integrity, not instability?


Contact us to learn how our GenAI Governance & Navigation Suite can provide the clarity, leverage, and protection you need.

Comments


Tiangay Kemokai Law, P.C.

©2025 by Tiangay Kemokai Law, P.C. Attorney Tiangay Kemokai-Baisley is responsible for the content on this website, which may contain an advertisement. The information on this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship and no attorney-client relationship is formed until conflicts have been cleared and both parties have signed a written fee agreement. The materials and information on this website are for informational purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE  FUTURE OUTCOMES.  Any testimonials or endorsements do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter

bottom of page